Giving you a wake up call to past and present stories the elitists hoped you didn't pay attention to. From whistleblowers to entertainers, if someone is talking we are listening. Seek truth in between the lies, yells, exaggerations, jokes, and tears made by Hollywood celebrities and other entertainers. It doesn't pay to lie first, then tell the truth later. Information is provided from various media outlets and doesn't necessarily express the personal views of the blog owner.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Deceased Researcher and Former Music Producer Talked about Secret Society and Entertainment Industry
John Todd shares some insightful information at a Christian gathering about government, secret society, and the entertainment industry.
Former Member of R&B Group Dru Hill Speaks About the Music Industry
It has been said that many entertainers who have become very successful in the music industry had to sell their souls. The process happens slowly. James Green, former member of Dru Hill, said that being in a group selling one's soul doesn't have to occur with all members, all is needed is just one willing to do whatever is asked of him. He personally didn't take any oaths or sign his name in blood on a contract.
There is a "They" in control of the artists.
They decide whether they live or die. In this video, "they" is used alot. Celebrities whether in government, music, arts, media, or in other industries are controlled by groups that are not known among the masses.
Entertainment is More than Just Entertainment But Watch and Pray About Some Researchers
David Icke has been very outspoken about the entertainment industry, secret societies, mind control, and other related subject matter. Many researchers question why is he still alive. Some have said he sold out and he is a disinformation agent.
Jordan Maxwell shares insight about the entertainment industry and how movies are used to program the masses. But he too has been accused by researchers of selling out. This video shows that Maxwell and Icke are working for dark entities.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Don Cheadle Spoke Out About Selective Editing in Media
It was just a simple Twitter post that spoke volumes made by actor and activist Don Cheadle about NBC's handling of the Zimmerman 911 call. In case you forgot, this was the story about a young black teen, Trayvon Martin, fatally shot by a neighborhood watch volunteer, George Zimmerman. In support of the fallen victim, many put their hoods up while the case was being investigated.
Cheadle accused NBC of misleading the public in the way that they edited the Zimmerman 911 call. One detail edited was Zimmerman's assumption the teen was black without any prompting from the 911 call operator. The actor writes on Twitter and comments to a follower which was picked up by Twitchy, an entertainment social blog,
Notice how much power a person, who plays other characters, receives from the public. Did you see how he can use his platform "to apply pressure" on certain political figures to bring attention to a matter that truly has nothing to do with the masses? But because many love his movies and has listened to him in the past, they will respond, "Okay Don Cheadle, I will do what you say." What is scary about this and other videos on this site is that, you have gullible people you probably know in your own circles that you have tried repeatedly to get them to do certain things like pay attention to your family, teach your children, exercise, eat healthy, etc. but if a celebrity, who doesn't know anything about them, came into their homes and told them, "You need to...You should...Why don't you...?" you know they would listen at least for a time. Money and power go hand and hand and it can be used to get the so-called elect of our society to do things they wouldn't ordinarily do. Use your own money, power and platform wisely, you never know who is watching and listening.
Cheadle accused NBC of misleading the public in the way that they edited the Zimmerman 911 call. One detail edited was Zimmerman's assumption the teen was black without any prompting from the 911 call operator. The actor writes on Twitter and comments to a follower which was picked up by Twitchy, an entertainment social blog,
"Dear
NBC News, Huh???
It was
"an error made in the production process that we deeply regret."
Really? "Error?" Anybody out there know anything about
editing?
Unless
the AVID malfunctioned, SOMEBODY was faking the funk. Why?, is the
question. What was furthered beyond NBC news ratings?
Dangerous
subject matter to be f*cking with. Irresponsible, incendiary and
completely counter to the furtherance of justice for either side
Edited,
produced, AND greenlit to air. The greatest responsibility lies with
those listed but in the inverse order.
Truth
doesn't need "help." If Zimmerman is proven guilty of a
crime he should be charged accordingly and prosecuted to the full
extent."
"One more outburst like that and we will..." that's what I was thinking. What are the chances that someone who isn't quite sold on the story of poor black boy shot for doing nothing more than walking down the street was murdered is going to think? I will tell you what I thought, "Choose wisely what battle you want to use your platform to promote change." These entertainers know that you don't bite the hand that feeds you. Many of these media power players are one big family, so to speak. If one doesn't like this entertainer and that one for speaking out about a certain subject matter, it means nothing to silence them. I recall a verse in the Bible that talks about not getting involved in another man's quarrel. Was any of us there to know what really happened? Imagine this for a moment, a guy comes up to a teen in the dark and asks him a question like, "What are you doing here?" The boy gets an attitude and starts cursing. Let's say the guy attempts to man-handle him. The boy goes off, "What the...!? So he starts giving that man a beating of his life. In a rage, ashamed, confused, and shocked, the man, reaches for his weapon and kills him. End of story. No hoods up, no celebrities commenting, and no parents saying too much because they know how their smart mouth kids can be. But then the media shows up and the whole thing gets blown out of proportion to the point that people are watching their calendars to find out when the suspect is going to be brought to justice.
Don Cheadle has been active in our world on a variety of issues such as the Lazarus Effect, red pills that some media reports claim to help those who are suffering from AIDs in Africa live longer. Notice in the following video, Cheadle, as well as other celebrities around the web, talk about the "Red" campaign. I am always overly cautious about any heavy promotion of anything with star-power behind it. Cheadle has also been outspoken in the past: about issues in Darfur, voting, and the government's handling of certain political issues. In the last video, as seen below, at a conference he shares his opinion somewhat, but carefully. He isn't so straightforward like he was in his Tweet about the Trayvon Martin case.
It seems that because this actor has played in movies in the past that exposed issues in foreign countries and has a large international following, he is used as a mouthpiece to "make this world better for the people." Nothing wrong with that; however, take your eyes off the star for a moment and what you will be left with is a question, "Who or what stands behind this man?" Consider redirecting your focus from Cheadle to the rich and powerful groups of this world who decide what is important and what is not--at least for a time--follow the money trail. Ask yourself, "What do these stars really want with me?" I'll take the liberty to answer that, your money, time and mind to help them spread their affiliations' propaganda. Will you be getting paid? No. Will you make a guest appearance on someone's show? Most likely not. Will they help you with your existing business? It all depends. What are your connections?
When the latest tragedy, event, issue, campaign etc. fades to black, on to the next hot topic for the celebrity. Every star knows he or she has to stay relevant and useful even if these things aren't the first things on his or her mind, they are important, because bills have to get paid and guilty feelings have to be put at ease if he or she has done some strange things in the entertainment idustry in the past that this person may not want to get out. This isn't to say Cheadle has done any of these things, but there are many, many entertainers who have. The witnesses from servers to maintenance men at celebrity functions, homes and elsewhere have anonmously reported many things in mainstream media. But I digress...
Compare Cheadle's rogue tweets with the videos below. Do you see the difference? Cheadle does what many stars do, he uses his platform to share a message. When the celebrity is on camera, in a controlled atmosphere, he is less likely to come off wrong, say things he later regrets, and most likely someone watching he or she during an interview can flag him or her not to say that, wrap it up, hold your hand this way, look that way, etc.
When the star is off camera, with no managers, public relations people, and others, they aren't always prepped or told what to do and say and this is where they can get themselves into trouble. If a star stops loving money and goods so much, undo his or her brainwashing of needing a lavish lifestyle that is far more than enough, he or she wouldn't have to worry over whether saying or doing the wrong thing might lead to a career suicide.
Sooner or later, one will reach a crossroads in the pursuit of truth that will look something like this in one's conscience mind, "Do this and say that to free the people knowing full well what the consequences will be? Or say that and do that just enough to win friends on both sides while still getting a paycheck?" Hmm.
Don Cheadle has been active in our world on a variety of issues such as the Lazarus Effect, red pills that some media reports claim to help those who are suffering from AIDs in Africa live longer. Notice in the following video, Cheadle, as well as other celebrities around the web, talk about the "Red" campaign. I am always overly cautious about any heavy promotion of anything with star-power behind it. Cheadle has also been outspoken in the past: about issues in Darfur, voting, and the government's handling of certain political issues. In the last video, as seen below, at a conference he shares his opinion somewhat, but carefully. He isn't so straightforward like he was in his Tweet about the Trayvon Martin case.
It seems that because this actor has played in movies in the past that exposed issues in foreign countries and has a large international following, he is used as a mouthpiece to "make this world better for the people." Nothing wrong with that; however, take your eyes off the star for a moment and what you will be left with is a question, "Who or what stands behind this man?" Consider redirecting your focus from Cheadle to the rich and powerful groups of this world who decide what is important and what is not--at least for a time--follow the money trail. Ask yourself, "What do these stars really want with me?" I'll take the liberty to answer that, your money, time and mind to help them spread their affiliations' propaganda. Will you be getting paid? No. Will you make a guest appearance on someone's show? Most likely not. Will they help you with your existing business? It all depends. What are your connections?
When the latest tragedy, event, issue, campaign etc. fades to black, on to the next hot topic for the celebrity. Every star knows he or she has to stay relevant and useful even if these things aren't the first things on his or her mind, they are important, because bills have to get paid and guilty feelings have to be put at ease if he or she has done some strange things in the entertainment idustry in the past that this person may not want to get out. This isn't to say Cheadle has done any of these things, but there are many, many entertainers who have. The witnesses from servers to maintenance men at celebrity functions, homes and elsewhere have anonmously reported many things in mainstream media. But I digress...
Compare Cheadle's rogue tweets with the videos below. Do you see the difference? Cheadle does what many stars do, he uses his platform to share a message. When the celebrity is on camera, in a controlled atmosphere, he is less likely to come off wrong, say things he later regrets, and most likely someone watching he or she during an interview can flag him or her not to say that, wrap it up, hold your hand this way, look that way, etc.
When the star is off camera, with no managers, public relations people, and others, they aren't always prepped or told what to do and say and this is where they can get themselves into trouble. If a star stops loving money and goods so much, undo his or her brainwashing of needing a lavish lifestyle that is far more than enough, he or she wouldn't have to worry over whether saying or doing the wrong thing might lead to a career suicide.
Sooner or later, one will reach a crossroads in the pursuit of truth that will look something like this in one's conscience mind, "Do this and say that to free the people knowing full well what the consequences will be? Or say that and do that just enough to win friends on both sides while still getting a paycheck?" Hmm.
Notice how much power a person, who plays other characters, receives from the public. Did you see how he can use his platform "to apply pressure" on certain political figures to bring attention to a matter that truly has nothing to do with the masses? But because many love his movies and has listened to him in the past, they will respond, "Okay Don Cheadle, I will do what you say." What is scary about this and other videos on this site is that, you have gullible people you probably know in your own circles that you have tried repeatedly to get them to do certain things like pay attention to your family, teach your children, exercise, eat healthy, etc. but if a celebrity, who doesn't know anything about them, came into their homes and told them, "You need to...You should...Why don't you...?" you know they would listen at least for a time. Money and power go hand and hand and it can be used to get the so-called elect of our society to do things they wouldn't ordinarily do. Use your own money, power and platform wisely, you never know who is watching and listening.
Speak Out About What You Do in Your Private Time Expect Backlash
It doesn't matter whether a person is affiliated with a religion, grew up with a racist or marched with sexist relatives to further divide the sexes, or simply doesn't like people, if you expose yourself to those who already have personal issues with "your kind" then don't get angry, plot revenge, or act shocked. You told people what you are, what you do, or what you like and now you have put yourself out there to be accepted or rejected.
I personally find it useless and silly to keep berating people about what one likes or doesn't like. Simply state how you feel and if their are those who are in support, so be it, but if not, we move on. However, some groups want to shove personal preference down our throats as if it is the gospel of Jesus Christ, and that somehow if we just believe all might be saved from the gay man's wrath, the feminist's rage, and everyone else in between who would like to cast revenge on those who don't go along just to get along.
CNN anchor, Don Lemon, a respected black man in many circles, added the title gay to his profile and it didn't cause people to want to stop watching him, but it did get many to start thinking. Now I don't mention him, because I want to devote a piece to homosexuals; rather, I would like to share the comment he made about Jonah Hill being "a tool." On November 9, 2012, US Weekly reported the following, "The 46-year-old TV journalist got into a Twitter war with the 21 Jump Street actor Nov. 8. "Said hi to Jonah in a hotel," Lemon wrote. "Think he thought I was a bellman. Didn't know his name til the bellman told me. A lesson to always be kind." Lemon later that Hill, 28, 'was a tool.'"
Now in the past, I referenced Lemon's statement on another blog, because I was making a point about how actors are used in the entertainment industry like tools to promote a select club's agenda. But I am going to take it one step further based on Lemon's comment and how it relates to his sexuality.
When Lemon came out, you know he wasn't well-received by all. So it would make sense for those not in agreement with his open lifestyle to start using fellow actors to ignore, ridicule, or do other things to make the person feel so bad about what he or she has done that eventually they will self-sabotage. (That's right I said "actors" because journalists are just like entertainers in mainstream media too--used to stimulate, sway, and get the masses to "like" and "be a fan,")
Anyone, man, woman or child, who lives in such a way that goes against the norm, so to speak, will eventually feel the pain of the majority. As much as groups work hard to get others to accept them, as long as we live in a world with opinion, critical thinking skills, religion, rights, laws, personal experience, morals, and free speech, people will think the way they want no matter how many incentives, promises, schemes, lies, or tricks a group uses to get the public to accept whatever whenever.
Personal preference is always a personal decision and if you invite others into your world, expect backlash. If a righteous man will be criticized for doing the right thing, what do you think might happen to any one of us for speaking truth about any and all things whether right or wrong?
I personally find it useless and silly to keep berating people about what one likes or doesn't like. Simply state how you feel and if their are those who are in support, so be it, but if not, we move on. However, some groups want to shove personal preference down our throats as if it is the gospel of Jesus Christ, and that somehow if we just believe all might be saved from the gay man's wrath, the feminist's rage, and everyone else in between who would like to cast revenge on those who don't go along just to get along.
CNN anchor, Don Lemon, a respected black man in many circles, added the title gay to his profile and it didn't cause people to want to stop watching him, but it did get many to start thinking. Now I don't mention him, because I want to devote a piece to homosexuals; rather, I would like to share the comment he made about Jonah Hill being "a tool." On November 9, 2012, US Weekly reported the following, "The 46-year-old TV journalist got into a Twitter war with the 21 Jump Street actor Nov. 8. "Said hi to Jonah in a hotel," Lemon wrote. "Think he thought I was a bellman. Didn't know his name til the bellman told me. A lesson to always be kind." Lemon later that Hill, 28, 'was a tool.'"
Now in the past, I referenced Lemon's statement on another blog, because I was making a point about how actors are used in the entertainment industry like tools to promote a select club's agenda. But I am going to take it one step further based on Lemon's comment and how it relates to his sexuality.
When Lemon came out, you know he wasn't well-received by all. So it would make sense for those not in agreement with his open lifestyle to start using fellow actors to ignore, ridicule, or do other things to make the person feel so bad about what he or she has done that eventually they will self-sabotage. (That's right I said "actors" because journalists are just like entertainers in mainstream media too--used to stimulate, sway, and get the masses to "like" and "be a fan,")
Anyone, man, woman or child, who lives in such a way that goes against the norm, so to speak, will eventually feel the pain of the majority. As much as groups work hard to get others to accept them, as long as we live in a world with opinion, critical thinking skills, religion, rights, laws, personal experience, morals, and free speech, people will think the way they want no matter how many incentives, promises, schemes, lies, or tricks a group uses to get the public to accept whatever whenever.
Personal preference is always a personal decision and if you invite others into your world, expect backlash. If a righteous man will be criticized for doing the right thing, what do you think might happen to any one of us for speaking truth about any and all things whether right or wrong?
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Just When You Were Sold on the Cop-Killer Story...
With no substantial proof, other than a manifesto (that anyone could have written) and some assorted items sent to a media organization known for telling lies, a whistleblower is labeled as a cop-killer. No security cameras show him killing anyone. The manifesto could not be authenticated by CNN before it was presented. Then after two days of not seeing or hearing anything new about the suspect, since the release of the news story, a couple video tapes show up with this "Dorner" (whose name is similar to Drone), making a purchase and throwing some things away. Then we see an ariel view of a burning cabin in Big Bear. The excuse made about the lack of news coverage for a time was that they didn't want their investigation disrupted.
So what happened during those two days, really? A news source that is well-known in Mexico reports that Dorner said, "It's not me!" He also wanted his mother to know he was okay. Did the American authorities call the ignorant Dorner back to town to make a few appearances on camera to validate this false story only to kill him later? Was the ex-cop nothing more than a face used to promote some major changes?
Dorner was supposedly the first human tracked with spy drones. Was this situation used to present the use of the spy drones to the already brainwashed public who believed Dorner killed the cops? Do you still believe that this man killed anyone?
Interesting the following story never saw the light of day in the states. Also, it would make sense why Mexico came up in the media, not because Dorner took off to go there, but maybe he was already there and caught wind possibly of the plot to implicate him, hmm. The Mark Furhman reference seems false, considering the bad reputation that man has, but then again if you want to look like you put your bias racial views behind you, then why not partner with a black man? But those who already believe one false story will most likely discredit any that might have some truth in them.
How soon you forget, there were similar situations in the most recent past of the lone gunman taking anti-depressants. You might remember the computer programmer, John McAfee founder of McAfee anti-virus software, who was running for his life too, accused of killing his neighbors. The story faded to black.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
ADVERTISE HERE
Individuals, groups and businesses who would like to advertise, send requests here: nichollmcguire@yahoo.com.
Blog Content
2 Chainz
9/11
90s celebrities
About Us
abuse
addictions
adrian peterson
advertisers
agendas
aliens hybrids
alternative media
Amish
ashton kutcher
baseball scandals
beta slaves
beyonce
biggie smalls
bill cosby
billionaires
black dot
black hollywood
black ministers
blog contributor
blood
bobbi kristina
bohemian grove
boys town
brainwashing
brandon smiley
breakup rumors
carrie fisher
cathy obrien
celebrities fake lives
celebrity and related deaths
celebrity divorce rumors
celebrity girls gone bad
celebrity mental issues
celebrity parties
celebrity photos
celebrity power couples
celebrity sacrifice
celebrity statements
celebrity weight loss
celebrity whackers
censorship
chadwick boseman
children
chris brown
chris dorner
chris kyle
christians
CIA
civil rights
cnbc reporter
code of silence
consciousness
conspiracy theories
corey feldman
corey haim
covid
crazy people
crisis actors
criticism
cults
currency
danny glover
dark web
david crowley
day26
dead celebrities
death hoax
deception
delusional people
demons
devilish people
disgraced celebrities
distractions
DMX
DNA
domestic violence
don cheadle
don lemon
donald trump
dr. martin luther king
dr. udo ulfkotte
dru hill
drugs
eddie griffin
education
edward snowden
elections
elite secrets
elitist groups
eminem
employment
entertainment industry exposed
expose ancestry
exposing family
faith
fake beauty
fake media
false messiah
false religions
fame
fat joe
FBI
fema camps
feminism
financial crisis
food
fracking
freemasons
g craig lewis
game show cheaters
gang stalking
gay hollywood
geo-engineering
george carlin
glenn beck
gold
gospel music
government
government leaders
greedy people
handlers
hidden news stories
hillary clinton
hip hop exposed
homosexual rappers
homosexuality
human cloning
human rights
human trafficking
human zoos
hurricane irma
illuminati
inaugurations
insanity
internet trolls
investments
irs
jack gleeson
jail
jamie zimmerman
jay pharoah
jay z friend
john lennon
john mcafee
john todd
justin bieber
kanye west
kardashians
katt williams
katy perry
kevin hart
kidnapped children
kobe
lady gaga
lecrae
lenon honor
lies
lil wayne
lip reading
ll cool j
lupe fiasco
magicians
maino
major news
malcom x
martial law
Me Too Movement
mean celebrities
media hype
media manipulation
meghan markle and harry
michael hastings
michael jackson
microwave weaponry
miley cyrus
military
mind control
mk-ultra
mo'nique
modeling
money
movies
murder
music
narcissism
natural resources
nba athletes
nba refs
nbc
new world order
new years day
nfl athletes
NHL
nick cannon
nicki minaj
nightmares
obsessed fans
occult communication
occult groups
occult Hollywood
oil
oprah
p. diddy
paris jackson
paul mooney
pedophiles
personality disorders
phyllis hyman
police
politicians
porn producer
pornography
prayer
predictive programming
prescription medicines
president barak obama
presidents
prince
princess diana
prophecy
protests
psychics
psychopaths in Christianity
r kelly
racism
rap music
ray rice
reality shows
recording contracts
reporter meltdown
RFID implants
rich
rick ross
rigged football
ripoffs
robin williams
ron paul
roseanne barr
rothschild
Russia
sage stallone
satanic hollywood
satanism
scientology
scott getzinger
secret groups
sex abuse
sex rituals
sexual harassment
shaquille o'neal
sharyl attkisson
shootings
simpsons predictions
society
soul selling celebrities
speak out
spies
spiritual commentary
sports
stalking
Stephen Boss
steve cokely
steve harvey
superbowls
syrian war
T.I.
tamar braxton
taraji henson
technology
television programming
television shows
todd bridges
tom joyner
tone loc
toxic people
track and field
trayvon martin
tricky film
truth
tupac
tv programming
virtual surveillance
walt disney
war veterans
wealthy
whistleblowers
wisdom
witchcraft
world corruption
world history
world wars
wrongful death